Social Distancing during COVID-19 Pandemic among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

(1) Background: Social distancing rules have been widely introduced in the fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. So far, the effectiveness of these methods has not been assessed in the group of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. (2) Methods: The study included 473 patients with IBD who made 1180 hospital visits from 1 May to 30 September 2020. During each visit, the patients completed a five-step, progressive scale that was developed to assess the degree of social isolation. In parallel, other demographic data were collected and the concentrations of anti-severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG and IgM+IgA antibodies were measured using the ELISA method. (3) Results: The study found a significant correlation between the degree of social distancing and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the groups with the lowest degree of isolation (3 to 5). (4) Conclusions: Maintaining social distancing is an effective method for reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus among IBD patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with higher seroprevalence rates of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: According to the current data, there has been no increase in the incidence of COVID­19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVES: The available data are based on symptomatic cases and do not include the asymptomatic ones. To measure the exact infection rate, we initiated a study that aimed to assess the seroprevalence of anti-SARS­CoV­2 antibodies in IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 864 individuals were enrolled in the study, including 432 patients with IBD (290 with Crohn disease and 142 with ulcerative colitis) and 432 controls without IBD (healthcare professionals) matched for age and sex. Serum samples were prospectively collected, and the presence of anti-SARS­CoV­2 immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM + IgA antibodies were measured using the enzyme­linked immunoassay method (Vircell Microbiologists). RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of positive results for anti-SARS­CoV­2 antibodies, both in the IgG and IgM + IgA class, was found in patients with IBD (4.6% and 6%, respectively, compared with 1.6% and 1.1%, respectively, in controls; both P values <0.05). No patient had symptomatic COVID­19. There was no association among patients' age, sex, drugs used for IBD, or disease activity and the occurrence of IgG antibodies. CONCLUSION: Patients with IBD may be at higher risk of developing SARS­CoV­2 infection, defined as the presence of elevated levels of anti-SARS­CoV­2 IgG antibodies, but not of having a symptomatic and / or severe course of COVID­19 compared with healthcare professionals without IBD.

Convalescent plasma treatment is associated with lower mortality and better outcomes in high-risk COVID-19 patients - propensity-score matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma (CP) transfusion in a group of high-risk COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 204 patients from a single tertiary-care hospital, hospitalized with COVID-19, of whom 102 were treated with CP administration and standard care (PG) and 102 others who received standard care only (CG). The CG was selected from 336 hospitalized patients using the propensity-score matching (PSM) technique using age, MEWS score, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was mortality rate; secondary outcomes were the requirement of a ventilator, length of ventilator need, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and length of overall hospital confinement. Additionally, parameters predicting death in COVID-19 patients were identified. RESULTS: Findings confirmed a significantly lower mortality rate in the PG versus the CG (13.7% vs. 34.3 %, p = 0.001) and a significant difference in the cumulative incidence of death between the two groups (p < 0.001). CP treatment was associated with lower risk of death (OR = 0.25 CI95 [0.06; 0.91], p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in ICU stay, ventilator time, and hospitalization time between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly lower mortality rate was observed in the group of patients treated with CP. Age, presence of cardiac insufficiency, active cancer, a ventilator requirement, and length of hospitalization significantly increased the risk of death in both groups. Our study shows that CP affords better outcomes when administrated in the earlier stage of high-risk COVID-19 disease.